< Terug naar vorige pagina

Publicatie

Syncope in dental practices : a systematic review on aetiology and management

Tijdschriftbijdrage - Review Artikel

Introduction This systematic review aimed to give an overview of the current evidence sur-rounding the aetiology and management in terms of treatment and prevention of syncope in dental practices. Alongside the occurrence, the practitioner's com-petence, and the association between syncope and local anaesthetics were dis-cussed. Methods An electronic search in EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane databases and a hand search were performed by 2 independent reviewers to identify stud-ies up to November 2019. Eligibility criteria were applied and relevant data was extracted. Inclusion criteria covered all types of dental treatment under local anaesthesia or conscious sedation performed by a wide range of oral health care workers in their practices. Risk of bias of the included studies was as-sessed using the methodological tools recommend by Zeng et al.1 No restric-tions were made to exclude papers from qualitive analysis based on risk of bias assessment. Results The search yielded a total of 18 studies for qualitative analysis. With the ex-ception of one prospective cohort study, all articles were considered having a high risk of bias. Meta-analysis showed that dentists encountered on average 1.2 cases of syncope per year. The male gender (RR=2.69 [1.03, 7.02]), dental fear (RR=3.55 [2.22, 5.70]), refusal of local anaesthesia in non-acute situations (OR = 12.9) and the use of premedication (RR = 4.70, [1.30, 16.90]) increased the risk for syncope. Treatment and prevention were underreported as both were solely discussed in one study. The supine recovery position with raised legs and oxygen administration (15l/min) was presented as an effective treatment. The Medical Risk-Related History (MRRH) system was proposed as prevention pro-tocol, yet this protocol was ineffective in reducing incidence rates (p = 0.27). The majority of dentists (79.2%) were able to diagnose syncope, yet most (86%) lacked the skills for appropriate treatment. Only 57,6% of dental practices were equipped with an oxygen cylinder. Conclusions Syncope is the most common emergency in dental practices. Nonetheless, the vast majority of dentists do not seem competent nor prepared to manage this emergency. Psychogenic factors seem to play an important role in provoking syncope. Placing the patient in a supine reclined position with raised legs in combination with the administration of oxygen seems effective for regaining consciousness. Although valuable in many aspects, risk assessment by medical history taking is not proven to result in fewer episodes. The strength of these conclusions is low based on GRADE guidelines.(2)
Tijdschrift: JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE
ISSN: 1532-3390
Issue: 3
Volume: 21
Jaar van publicatie:2021
Toegankelijkheid:Open