< Terug naar vorige pagina
Publicatie
Erfgoed: dissonant, donker, moeilijk, pijnlijk, beschamend, toxisch, gecontesteerd, … Over problematiserende adjectieven
Tijdschriftbijdrage - Tijdschriftartikel
Korte inhoud:In this selective review of recent scholarly literature in museum and
(critical) heritage studies, a whole series of adjectives linked to the
concept of heritage (or memory) are presented and interpreted:
dissonant, dark, difficult, painful, shameful, toxic, contested. The
importance of several protagonists like Gregory Ashworth and John E.
Tunbridge (dissonance), Tony Seaton (thanatourism), John Lennon and
Malcolm Foley (dark tourism), Suzie Thomas (dark heritage), Sharon
MacDonald (difficult heritage), William Logan and Keir Reeves
(painful difficult heritage), Laurajane Smith (emotional heritage) and
Gustav Wollentz (toxic heritage, difficult heritage), is highlighted.
A flood of adjectives, including “controversial” keeps on coming, for
instance in the leading International Journal of Heritage Studies. We suggest
considering the use of “controversies” (as an eye- or can-opener, in the sense controversies mapping and actor-network theory are exploring
the concept) and going beyond the limitations of a!aching adjectives to
the concept of heritage.
(critical) heritage studies, a whole series of adjectives linked to the
concept of heritage (or memory) are presented and interpreted:
dissonant, dark, difficult, painful, shameful, toxic, contested. The
importance of several protagonists like Gregory Ashworth and John E.
Tunbridge (dissonance), Tony Seaton (thanatourism), John Lennon and
Malcolm Foley (dark tourism), Suzie Thomas (dark heritage), Sharon
MacDonald (difficult heritage), William Logan and Keir Reeves
(painful difficult heritage), Laurajane Smith (emotional heritage) and
Gustav Wollentz (toxic heritage, difficult heritage), is highlighted.
A flood of adjectives, including “controversial” keeps on coming, for
instance in the leading International Journal of Heritage Studies. We suggest
considering the use of “controversies” (as an eye- or can-opener, in the sense controversies mapping and actor-network theory are exploring
the concept) and going beyond the limitations of a!aching adjectives to
the concept of heritage.
Gepubliceerd in: Volkskunde
ISSN: 0042-8523
Issue: 3
Volume: 123
Pagina's: 277-296
Jaar van publicatie:2022
Trefwoorden:controversial, controversial heritage, dark heritage, toxic heritage, UNESCO, dissonant, contested
Toegankelijkheid:Open
Reviewstatus:Peerreview