< Terug naar vorige pagina

Publicatie

The structure of analogical reasoning in bioethics

Tijdschriftbijdrage - Tijdschriftartikel

Casuistry, which involves analogical reasoning, is a popular methodological approach in bioethics. The method has its advantages and challenges, which are widely acknowledged. Meta-philosophical reflection on exactly how bioethical casuistry works and how the challenges can be addressed is limited. In this paper we propose a framework for structuring casuistry and analogical reasoning in bioethics. The framework is developed by incorporating theories and insights from the philosophy of science: Mary Hesse's ideas on horizontal and vertical relations in analogical reasoning in the sciences, Paul Bartha's articulation model of analogical reasoning and Daniel Steel's insights on mechanism-based extrapolation in biomedical research. Adopting our framework results in two practical benefits: it sets methodological standards for analogical reasoning and enables us to compare and evaluate diverging lines of analogical reasoning in a systematic way. Adopting the framework also has theoretical benefits: it helps to understand how analogical reasoning can have moral normativity; it pinpoints exactly where moral principles or theories enter analogical reasoning; and it helps to understand why casuistry is an attractive method in bioethics and in applied ethics more generally.
Tijdschrift: MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY
ISSN: 1572-8633
Issue: 1
Volume: 26
Pagina's: 69 - 84
Jaar van publicatie:2023
Toegankelijkheid:Open